The Elephant in the Room

There’s an elephant in the room! It is loud and it stinks, but no one wants to talk about it. I refer, of course to the explosion of human population since the turn of the nineteenth century that is threatening to overwhelm the planet. No one wants to talk about overpopulation, of course, because in the minds of a great many people overpopulation is closely tied to the issue of abortion — a topic that is very emotional and produces much more heat than light. But the two issues are not necessarily tied to one another at all. Population control does not entail abortion; it can be accomplished in a great many ways that don’t conflict with deeply held beliefs.

Having said that, I would like to take a quick look at the issue, because it has been said that the population explosion is the root cause for many of the problems facing humankind today — problems such as pollution of air and water, nuclear proliferation, desertification, deforestation, world-wide violence, eradication of numerous animal species, and increasing numbers of the poor and destitute humans. These problems are almost certainly exacerbated by, if not reducible to, the fact that there are simply too many humans on the planet. It is a problem that demands our attention, whether we want to think about it or not.

Consider:  It is estimated that it wasn’t until 1804 that human populations on earth reached one billion. The human population then began to “explode” and was doubled by 1927. By 1960 it was three billion and is now at seven billion. It is projected to reach eight billion by 2025-2030. Human numbers on earth have grown by a billion people since 1999! Estimates by such groups as the Club of Rome have concluded that the earth may have already reached its carrying capacity, which raises the specter of widespread starvation. The InterAcademy Panel Statement on Population Growth, ratified by 58 countries in 1994 noted that the growth in human population at that time was “unprecedented,” which strikes me as an understatement. It will become increasingly difficult, if not impossible, to feed everyone on earth, especially in the face of climate change.

The really curious thing about this problem is that its solution is so simple: family planning. It is something that is ready at hand and available to all, or nearly all. In fact, this country was very much involved in funding family planning efforts in Third World countries, and the project was making real progress, until a certain Republican president (who shall remain nameless) put a stop to it — on the mistaken grounds, once again, that it fostered abortion. Even now, our popular TV shows like to focus on large families and the birth of a baby to a woman whose “biological clock” is ticking — even is she happens to be unmarried and has no means of raising the child once it is born — is sure to raise the ratings. Not long ago we made a hero out of a man who had just fathered his twentieth child by placing his picture on the front page of our newspapers, and applauding his manliness. In fact, his lack of social conscience does not warrant applause, it warrants derision. In this case more is not better. Even though the problem is not as great in this country as it is elsewhere, it affects us all and we need to reflect on the duties we all have to future generations. The elephant is getting restless.


2 thoughts on “The Elephant in the Room

  1. Hello Hugh! When I think of world population I also try to consider what is sustainable into the infinite future. Surely the notion of “economic growth”, so prized by virtually everyone, is not sustainable. Eventually, the human race will be forced to live on what the earth and the sun generate dynamically. I think that economic growth assumes that the earth is an infinite resource and it ain’t. This leads one to think about how many human beings the earth can support into the infinite future and how the pie will get sliced. Capitalism cannot be sustained because a capitalist enterprise must grow or die and in the time of earth, sun resource stasis growth will cease. I have no answers. I am wondering if anyone else does.

  2. Interesting blog, Hugh. We have a mutual friend in Trent Redfield. My answer to Dick (though I’m a creative person without cred) is to start small but quickly with great derision for egomaniacs who overbreed and think their genes are superior to all, therefore entitling their endless spawn to the elephant’s share of limited and finite resources in our dark future. Bumperstickers, perhaps.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s