Back On Board

The conservative newspaper “Wall Street Journal” recently faulted Mitt Romney for fumbling the ball on “Obamacare,” calling him “dumb” and insisting that his waffling on whether the mandate is a tax or a penalty may end up costing him the White House. They also faulted him for taking an expensive vacation at a key moment in this important race. Poor Mitt can’t win for losing.

A recent article on Huffington Post summarized the Wall Street op-ed piece and also noted that Mitt’s overall strategy is to repeatedly point to the sitting president’ failure to solve America’s economic woes. Specifically, the article says Romney’s campaign strategy so far has been to pivot all points of discussion to Obama’s failed economic record, but according to the Journal, voters would benefit from actually learning why Romney’s policies would fare any better — something his campaign has yet to elaborate on.

I am not a political strategist, but it does seem to me that voters in this country find a willingness to change one’s mind in the face of new facts a serious character flaw. As a general rule, I would not fault Romney for changing his mind unless he did it for purely political reasons — which is assuredly the case here. But then apparently I am more tolerant than most. Voters faulted George McGovern for changing his mind about Thomas Eagleton in 1972, a decision that critics said virtually assured Richard Nixon’s victory. In any event, the pattern has been fairly clear since that time: be consistent even if you are consistently wrong. Voters admire a man or woman who “sticks by their guns” even if the path they have chosen is stupid and possibly treacherous — witness George W. Bush and the “weapons of mass destruction” (which some people still think are hidden somewhere in Iraq). But I suspect voters will soon forget that Mitt has done an about-face on the mandate, that he may have fumbled the ball, because he and his team will divert their attention elsewhere.

Romney’s strategy is to simply say nothing until his opponent opens his mouth, or keep pointing an angry finger at the economy while he repeatedly insists it’s all Obama’s fault. This may in fact be a politically wise course to take, given past elections. If we have learned anything, we have learned that if a thing is repeated often enough, people will believe it. It doesn’t matter if what is repeated is right or wrong, true or false, no one will take the time to check. If they hear is often enough, it is as though it were carved in stone.

So we had best prepare ourselves for the endless repetition of the mantra: Obama is to blame for the retched economy….and he wants to raise your taxes. It will be repeated ad nauseam. In the meantime, Mitt has joined his fellows on the Republican band wagon and now insists that the mandate is a tax (which Obama has foisted on the American people) and we will soon forget that he ever thought otherwise. All we will hear is how the sitting President is to blame for the poor economy and for the thousands of Americans being out of work — though, as the above quote suggests, we should not expect this candidate to provide us with a program of his own or convince us how he would have acted other than Obama has acted — given the mess he inherited.

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Back On Board

  1. Hugh. this is great. The thing that I am so puzzled by is changing your mind when you may have been wrong is one thing (and should not be viewed as a weakness), but changing your mind on your greatest success, something you worked tirelessly for, is another. Governor Romney went to great lengths to get RomneyCare passed in MA and had to advocate the mandate as a key part of it requiring people to be responsible. Now, for him to change his mind on that strikes me as someone who will say anything to get elected.

    • I agree. But to the man’s credit, he has been reluctant to get on board. But the man knows how to play the game, and he wants to win this election.

  2. You are so right about people believing what they hear again and again. That is what I can’t stand about ballot initiatives. It becomes a race to see who can spend the most money on TV ads…

    • That’s pretty much what politics has become: the 10 second thought bite repeated again and again. People’s attention spans have become shorter and for the marketing people shorter is better.

      ________________________________

  3. I was thinking some more about the McGovern comment from Huffington Post. I was remembering the line from “All the President’s Men” where Deep Throat said this is bigger than break-in. They did not want to run against Muskie and look who they are running against. I think the landslide would have happened whether McGovern changed his mind or not. As an 8th grader, I remember doing a class project about the election in 1972.

    • I think you are right. McGovern ran a very disorganized campaign. But the waffle certainly didn’t help him! It’s always to find THE cause of an event, as you know.

      ________________________________

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s