Selling The Presidential Product

I swore to myself that I would not kick the dead horse of the debates again, but like New Year’s Resolutions, this one evaporated quickly: I read an opinion piece in Yahoo News dissecting the last presidential debate on foreign policy. I knew going in that Obama should be the stronger voice in this arena, given Romney’s gaffes in England during the Olympics and his untimely remarks after the disaster in Libya. But what I did not anticipate was the degree to which this debate, like the others, is really all about image and making the right impression in order to win a political contest — and what this implies for the rest of us Consider the following remarks by Jeff Greenwald, opinion guru of Yahoo News:

There were times during this last debate when I almost thought I could hear the words of Mitt Romney’s advisers playing in his head:

“Look, big guy, you’re on track to win this thing. What they want to see tonight is a calm, confident leader, unthreatening, informed, unruffled. So don’t get up in Obama’s grill. Bring the conversation back to the economy when you can, and be the reasonable, credible Commander-in-Chief the voters want.”

In a word, create the impression that you are the man who these people want running the country for the next four years. Forget about the truth; forget about principles, and even about foreign policy; forget about strategies for strengthening the tattered reputation of this country in the Middle East; forget about how we might best deal with warring political and religious groups elsewhere in the world. Just smile and look calm and in control. Your audience tonight will be mostly women because their husbands and brothers will be watching sports, so your job is to bring them into the fold. As Greenfield said further on in his analysis:

Rather, his [Romney’s] challenge was to stand—or sit—face to face with the incumbent president and demonstrate that he could credibly argue matters of state, in the face of a debate foe determined to thrust and spar at every opportunity. Without question, Obama came into this last debate knowing that his presidency is hanging by a thread, in large measure due to his remarkably weak performance in the first debate. There was no opportunity he let pass.

If Greenfield is right, and he knows more about this sort of thing than I do, then those who plan debate strategies know that people don’t listen carefully; they just want to get a warm feeling after they watch another TV performance. This debate was carefully staged as one more form of entertainment on a night when the debate itself had to contend with Monday Night Football and the seventh game of the National League Baseball Championship between the Giants and the Cardinals. Know your audience and tell them what they want to hear.

Obama’s election is “hanging by a thread” because he failed to perform well in the first debate. How bizarre! I have always said these debates are about image and impressions. But the really disturbing thought is that the voters in this country buy into this crap; they are willing to be manipulated by image-makers and marketers into buying the candidate with the most sparkle. The debates are really about who a great many voters will cast their vote for — on the basis not of political records and probable performance in the highest office in the land, but about how a man looks on TV in a 90 minute debate with a political opponent who is working hard to create an even stronger impression. The founding fathers must be proud!

10 thoughts on “Selling The Presidential Product

  1. Any voter, and apparently there are many more than they should be, claiming that the debates changed their minds, or helped make up their mind, should be totally ashamed of themselves for admitting their foolishness, in public, and should turn in their voting card. What they’re admitting is that they haven’t spent the time to study the issues and the candidates, and they’re glad to leave the fate of their lives and that of the country in the hands of decision making voters like themselves, who were influenced not by the better candidate nor the better ideas, but who looked better on television.

    • Americans are not ashamed of anything Barney… you know that. They took “shame” out of the dictionary years ago. The reason why Americans find bold faced outrageous liars so attractive as leaders is, as a culture, it is what we have become.

      The truth is poison Barney.

      The child who cusses at his teacher isn’t an obnoxious little bastard who is in serious need of a truly fine ass-whipping…. And his parents are not miserable excuses for parents who should, rightly, hang their heads in shame. Oh NO!

      Junior just has ODD. (Obsessive Defiant Disorder)

      We have the government we richly deserve. Stinking thieves and bold faced liars.

  2. Barneysay is largely right. The debates should not be the only thing that sways a voter. Hopefully, there are some who have done their homework who are still undecided — and if the debate sways them, that is a better use of the debates. Unfortunately, there are too many who view the debates as their only source of info on the candidates and also view them (and the ensuing Saturday Night Live skits) as entertainment.

    I will say this: From the entertainment aspect, one has to love Obama’s lines about horses and bayonets and the board game “Battleship!” They were a bit condescending but made a firm and funny point: Mitt’s only dealt with theoreticals on the military, while Obama — himself a novice when he took office, now has four hard years of military decisions.

    • The Horse and Bayonet line was perfect, and complaints of Obama being condescending are ridiculous. Mittens whole campaign has been condescending, disrespectful and condescending. Obama put him in his place, and rightly, so.

  3. I told you they matter, Hugh! Not to you and to me so much, but to the people who will – heavy sigh – be deciding this election. For good or ill, they make a difference with the electorate. if Obama loses this election, it is sad to say, but that first debate is largely to blame in my opinion…it is just the reality of the sound bite, televised society we live in today.

  4. The Daily Show last night, which I saw today as a replay, was priceless. Jon Stewart showed footage of Romney, Ryan and others ripping Obama’s foreign policy – worst of the worst, worse than Jimmy Carter, etc. Then after saying well Romney was going to really take it to Obama, he showed Romney agreeing point after point with Obama. Stewart did this for about six points and each time, Romney agreed with Obama. Then he showed footage from the GOP debates and compared them to the last debate. First, for someone who found Obama’s foreign policy the worst of the worst, he should agree with him a lot. Second, he did not agree much with what he said in the GOP debates. This is yet another example of someone willing to say absolutely anything as it matters not what was said before. It would be humorous, but he may win and then what. Thanks for posting. BTG

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s