Remembering Swift

With apologies to Jon Stewart and Tom Lehrer, the greatest satirist who ever lived was Jonathan Swift. He is best known from the watered-down versions of his classic Gulliver’s Travels that has been turned into a children’s book — or from one of the terrible movies starring buffoons like Jack Black that trample on the greatness that was Swift. But Swift was above all things a cleric and a moralist and his satirical writings — of which Gulliver was merely one small portion — were almost always written to draw attention to a wrong with an eye to remedying the situation. And in Swift’s age, the latter seventeenth century and the early eighteenth, there was much that was wrong.  Swift saw it through the eyes of a brilliant, witty misanthrope. Human foibles drove him wild even though he was an amiable friend and companion with a small group of close friends and the two women who worshipped the ground he walked upon. And the Irish loved him and regarded him as their champion — as indeed he was.

Jonathan Swift (Courtesy of Wikipedia)

Jonathan Swift (Courtesy of Wikipedia)

Swift could be downright acerbic in his observations, as when he wrote the following in voicing his conviction that humans don’t bear a close look because the deeper you probe the worse they seem to be: “Last week I saw a woman flayed, and you will hardly believe how much it altered her person for the worse.” But he could be not only witty but wise and very timely — which is why he is worth reading even today. He noted, for example, that “. . . if we take an examination of what is generally understood by happiness, as it has respect either in the understanding or the senses, we shall find all its properties and adjuncts will herd under this short definition, that it is a perpetual possession of being well deceived. . . .This is the sublime and refined point of felicity, called the possession of being well deceived; the serene peaceful state, of being a fool among knaves.” Those of us who are not rich and who like to believe that the rich are not truly happy can take comfort in the conviction that their “happiness” is a “deception.”

Swift generally pilloried the vanities and stupidities of his age, always with an eye toward the need for bringing reason to bear on the frailties and weaknesses of humans. He was, among other things, a deeply religious and a wise man who knew the absurdities of many of the religious as well as most of those of the wealthy and famous. Of religion, for example, he said “We have just religion enough to make us hate but not enough to make us love one another.” When he turned his attention to the politicians and academics around him he could be particularly scathing. In fact, the major portion of his classic about Lemuel Gulliver focuses on the politics and politicians of his day many of whom he knew close up. He also knew and hated the pretense he found in the universities. In the third trip Gulliver made, for example, after being lowered from the flying island he visited an academy in the city of Lagado and was confronted by a variety of dusty and smelly academics who were intent on such esoteric pursuits as extracting sunbeams from cucumbers, building houses from the top down “like bees and spiders,” plowing fields with the snouts of hogs, making silk from spider webs, and curing colic with a pair of bellows. These were busy little men and women involved in absurd intellectual games while those around them went without food and shelter and agriculture suffered. We can agree that even in our day there is much being done in the academies of learning that has little to do with what is going on in the real world. One must wonder, for example, how research on the “Use of the Past-Perfect Participle In Late Elizabethan English” will help improve the lot of humankind. And it could be said that the entire attempt to land a man on the moon or a rover on Mars takes millions of dollars away from the genuine human needs here on our planet where many people don’t have food to put on the table — or a table, come to that. Swift was above all else a moralist.

Indeed, Swift’s “Modest Proposal” of eating all the small children in Ireland was an attempt to draw attention in England to the plight of the poor in Ireland where he was Dean of St. Patrick’s in Dublin until his death. But those in his day who read his works (always written anonymously) were afraid of the Dean and kept him from the posts he dearly wanted back in England. They knew who wrote them, and they read his works with great glee, laughing up their collective sleeves, but never realized that it was they who were being made to look foolish. In the end, Swift concluded, satire is a mirror in which the viewer sees everyone but himself. Indeed.

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “Remembering Swift

  1. But Hugh…the folks in Portland are still quite hopeful regarding the outcome of that sunbeams from cucumber experiment…

  2. “We have just religion enough to make us hate, but not enough to make us love one another.” This may be one of the most astute obeservations ever made and is so applicable even today. Many thanks for sharing, BTG

  3. The Swift quotation is much too true to dismiss out of hand, but it paints with a broad brush and typically such an action conceals as much as it reveals. We don’t have to engage in much effort to find many acts of unspeakable human depravity across the broad sweep of human history,many committed in the name of religion (and other Sirens) …and yet across that same broad sweep of time there have been countless acts of grace and kindness, generosity and compassion…acts of such depth and meaning that one is simply left to wonder in awe…these should not be dismissed or ignored or unrecognized or unremembered. Let us, for example applaud Swift, and condem the Westboro Baptist Church; let us condem Governor Jeff Davis of Arkansas (the only good N is a dead N) and applaud the words and acts of MLK from the Birmingham jail 50 years ago today…to do less would be to turn our backs on the reason Swift so valued.

    Thanks for the invitations to thought Mr. Hugh!

      • Unfortunately you might be right…and what makes it worse? The calculus of the world favors the bad guys. One Osama bin Laden, and a handful of his fellow travelers and the Trade Towers fall, and with them frankly a way of life across the world. Thousands rejoice in the streets of Boston and one filled with evil transforms joy to pain and death, and further robs every public gathering across the world of peace (this weekend’s Run Thru Redlands will be effected for crying out loud.). One Hitler? 20,000 concentration camps and 6.5 million dead…because? All of which places a special burden on those seeking to do well. Gov. Davis made his vile comment in a face to face encounter with President Roosevelt, campaigning then against the lynching laws…Roosevelt blasted back… “Governor, above all men you and I as …representatives of the law, owe it to our people, to civilization, to humanity, to do everything in our power, officially and unofficially, directly and iindirectly…”
        He might have been talking to is all…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s