Many years ago when “Rosemary’s Baby” was the talk of the country the movie appeared in the town of Marshall near where I live. The local paper was full of letters to the editor from local zealots who were urging people to stay away from the movie — including at least one who proudly admitted that he hadn’t seen it himself and was determined not to do so. That same sort of closed-mindedness is reflected in the outspoken criticism by a great many college teachers of literature in this country who are promoting postmodern literature and trashing the “great books” which they insist are the work of “dead, white, European males” and thus not worth reading. Like the letter-writer, a number of them have apparently not even bothered to read the books they condemn! One might expect closed-mindedness of small-town zealots but one would hope for a broader view from supposedly educated people who are responsible for opening the minds of the students in their charge.
The criticism of the great books tends to center not only on those who wrote them but also on the notion of “greatness” which, it is said, cannot be attributed to any works — except in an arbitrary manner. I have always disagreed with this claim, since there are criteria of greatness which some works of art and literature exhibit and the majority do not. Great books, especially great works of literature, are exceptionally well written, with a rich vocabulary, vivid descriptions, engrossing plots, and characters we recognize immediately. Further, they are rich with insights into the human condition and often contain profound reflections on the world we share in common. They are not just “stories;” they exhibit a kind of intuitive truth that simply cannot be found anywhere else. They make us pause and reflect. And there are great books in philosophy and science which may not be as well written, but have provided us with some of the seminal ideas that have helped shape our world, not to mention our nation’s Constitution — and even brought about revolutions. Such books are classics in the sense that they are seminal and they ring true today no less than they did when they were written, no matter who wrote them. They are the books that have been read by the exceptional minds that have preceded us; we seem determined to marginalize them — which is our mistake.
I have blogged about the wisdom of George Eliot so I won’t repeat here what I have already said. But Eliot was a superb writer, recognized in her day as one of the brightest and wisest of women who spent her declining years responding to letters from innumerable readers seeking her advice. But there are a great many authors of novels and plays who have exhibited remarkable insight and wisdom as well — and humor, such as Shakespeare’s famous line in Henry VI, Part II where we are told “The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.” Or this, in King Henry V, “The saying is true, ‘The empty vessel makes the greatest sound.”‘ And also Edith Wharton, whose sometimes biting satire leaves one’s head spinning — as in this description of a type: “Mrs. Ballinger is one of those ladies who pursue Culture in bands as though it were dangerous to meet it alone.” Wharton, who knew whereof she spoke, was able to strip the New York upper crust if its pretense and leave it shivering in the cold.
From his remarkable novel, Lost Illusions, I add Balzac’s characterization of a fop who “always behaved with distant politeness, cold, a little supercilious, like a man not in his proper place and waiting the favors of power. He allowed his social talents to be guessed at, and these had everything to gain by remaining unknown.” Pure genius (even in translation!). Like so much humor, these descriptions have the ring of truth in them. We all know women like Mrs. Ballinger, for example. But there is also the disturbing observation about the rapaciousness of humans by writers like the extraordinary Joseph Conrad, writing in a second language, in Heart of Darkness:
“The conquest of the earth, which mostly means the taking it away from those who have a different complexion or slightly flatter noses than ourselves, is not a pretty thing when you look into it too much. . . . The Eldorado Exploring Expedition . . .was reckless without hardihood, greedy without audacity, and cruel without courage; there was not an atom of foresight or of serious intention in the whole batch of them, and they did not seem aware these things are wanted for the work of the world. To tear treasure out of the bowels of the land was their desire, with no more purpose at the back of it than there is in burglars breaking into a safe.”
I hesitate to cite passages in the great works of philosophy, but one cannot do better than reflect on the early dialogues of Plato to which John Dewey said the rest of philosophy was mere footnotes. And there is Alexis de Tocqueville who visited this country for nine months in the early nineteenth century and then wrote the most perceptive book on Democracy in America that has ever been written, showing us all our warts and flaws along with the remarkable strengths that arose from the experiment we were then engaged in, such as the following: “I think that the democratic communities have a natural taste for freedom; left to themselves they will seek it, cherish it, and view any privation of it with regret. But for equality their passion is ardent, insatiable, incessant, invincible; they call for equality in freedom; and if they cannot obtain that they still call for equality in slavery.” Or Mark Twain who had so many penetrating insights into the human condition: “The fact that man knows right from wrong proves his intellectual superiority to the other creatures; but the fact that he can do wrong proves his moral inferiority to any creature that cannot.” And so it goes.
The pages of great books are filled with such insights and well crafted, profound words that cannot but change those who read them and take them to heart. And that is what ultimately comprises greatness in art: the power to change those who come into contact with it, a power it does not lose as the years pass. Great books, like great art, invite and reward repeat visits. Thus, those who would displace the works of Dead White European Males on the grounds of political correctness had better make damned sure that after reading those works they can find words of equal power and worth in the writings they substitute, because it is a zero-sum game. For every work chosen one is ignored.
Great books do invite and require repeat visits. I love Eliot and Wharton! What a great post. I agree that in an effort to include forgotten writers, some have tried to exclude the established great writers. It is a tricky thing, to include and exclude, for it can never actually include everybody and the act of including can exclude even those who are included by erasing difference and individuality. I don’t know if any of that makes sense, but it has been on my mind lately with some of the readings I’ve done at school.
It is indeed a delicate balance. I only ask that those who make the decisions actually read the writers they exclude!
Hugh, preach on. The life lessons which can be gleaned from these books, along with the historical context of fiction and non-fiction, provide us needed mirrors into our past and human nature. As we have discussed before, if you don’t know history you are destined to repeat it. Mark Twain’s ability to show through literature how Huck Finn learned the lessons of bigotry is a great example. He could not come out and say “don’t do this as it is wrong,” he had to literally sneak up on people. Thanks for sharing, BTG
i’ve found there are two types of people; those who rejoice in a beautiful piece of prose or poetry, and those who do not. i sometimes marvel at those who profess, ‘i’ve never completed a single book. just don’t like them..’ – how could they have passed thru school and universities w/o reading – and being inspired to read — wonderful classic works of literature?
sometimes i witness where society is headed, and i want to cry. the sad part is that most aren’t aware that they’re walking in a numbed state and are giving away their destinies in order to be part of the herd.
how lovely it is to spend time – even through cyberspace – with people who value words written long ago by the masters. we have so much to learn! don’t ever stop mentoring others, hugh!
z
Thanks, Z. Right back at ya!
Excellent, as usual, Hugh. It needs saying again and again that we should not throw out centuries of culture, art or history, because there is so much it still has to say to us. As Emily noted, there should be some room to expand the canon to include some neglected authors or some new ones. There aren’t many, but a few over the last 25-40 years (Philip Roth being one who really stands out at the moment) write as brilliantly and have as much to say as the great masters do. But, definitely, genius is genius, and art is art, and there remains an awful lot of genius in the great books.
No question. The past should not be revered simply because it’s past. But the burden of proof should be on those who would substitute the new for the old when the old still is relevant.