You may have seen the photo of Congressman Joe Barton (R-Tx), who sits on the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigation, staring at the audience with a vapid expression and making the incredibly stupid remark: the “wind is a finite resource and harnessing it would slow down the wind which would cause the temperature to go up.” The photo with that caption is making the rounds of the social media, though you probably thought it was on Fox News. It may have been.
It does give one hope when a conservative politician admits that there is such a thing as global warming, that what we do can alter the climate. So perhaps we should be pleased with that aspect of the man’s comment. I leave that to the optimists among us, those who insist on seeing the half-empty glass half full. I, on the other hand, think that this man sits on one of the most important sub-committees in Washington that helps determine our energy policies and it makes me shudder. But Barton is right about this: there is a finite resource in this country these days; but it’s not wind, it’s intelligence.
I had a discussion the other day with a local businessman who was chortling over a political cartoon in the paper that showed people shoveling out from under the some of the tons of snow Minnesota has received this Winter while making snide remarks about global warming. It was inevitable: a very cold Winter with a good deal of snow has many folks in this region of the country convinced that global warming is a fiction. They don’t grasp the concept of “global warming.” It’s not just Minnesota and it’s not just this Winter: it’s a trend and the trend is clearly upwards. Just ask the folks on the South Pacific islands who are seeing their villages disappear under higher ocean levels. Or the folks in Alaska who are having to move entire towns further inland as the ocean encroaches. Or California which is experiencing the worst drought they have seen in years.
When I tried to point out these features of the situation, I could see the man’s eyes glaze over as he responded that a member of his church who “teaches science” had assured his fellow parishioners that present-day concern over global warming is due simply to today’s more precise measuring equipment. Global warming is not for real, it’s merely apparent. I didn’t ask what sort of “science” the man taught, at what level, or what his credentials were to be making pronouncements about world climate conditions. In fact, I let the matter drop. After all in a small town one meets these people on a regular basis and sometimes has to do business with them. You just shake your head and smile.
But I came away with an insight about why there is such widespread denial on the issue of climate change. We all know that in Washington the denial is due to the powerful influence of Big Oil that determines whether a politician’s career comes to an abrupt end or continues on its way with plenty of cash to see the politician through the next election. Big Oil doesn’t want those under their collective thumb to talk about climate change, except to deny it. So people like Barton open their mouths and say incredibly stupid things. Sometimes it is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt. This was one of those times!
Outside of the Washington beltway I think it comes down to the fact that folks don’t want to accept the possibility that their own behavior contributes to global warming because that might mean they would have to alter their behavior. They don’t want to turn down their thermostats in the Winter or up in the Summer. They don’t want to drive more efficient cars or, better yet, walk or bike. In a word: they don’t want to be inconvenienced. Or, as we like to say, they don’t want to alter their “life-style.” So their arguments are accompanied by a closed mind and rest comfortably on the feelings of assurance they get from what they hear from Fox News, like-minded friends, and the science teachers in their church. They are convinced that things are just fine. Weather has always had its ups and downs after all; it has always been cyclical. This is nothing new and its only the liberal tree-huggers who try to tell us otherwise. Those who try to warn us are dismissed with a snort — as is a huge body of scientific evidence.
We humans are very good at dismissing arguments we find discomforting by labeling the speaker: Oh, she’s a liberal, or Oh, he’s one of those right-wingers. Heaven forbid we should actually listen to the things they have to say — even if we don’t agree with them! We are also very good at rationalizing. It takes real courage to accept as true a claim that doesn’t fit nicely into our belief system, especially if it is an uncomfortable truth. It is much easier to reject the claim as false, regardless of the data, and embrace only those beliefs that make us feel comfortable — which is simply more evidence that intelligence is a finite resource and seems to be diminishing rapidly. Just as the wind would be if we tried to harness it, apparently.
words fail me; with the limited amount of ‘news’ that i receive, there is almost always an article or graph that shows the global-warming statistics or an image of a vanishing island or – or – or —–
you are right to just shake your head and smile… and hope for a magic formula of words or example to awaken them. we’re losing so many species, from what i’ve read it’s DAILY, and i crave the high-speed (any speed!) technology to do more research!
as always, thanks for another great post!
Thanks, Z. It’s good to hear from you again. You are right: there just doesn’t seem to be a way to penetrate through the thick skulls of those who deny the obvious!
Hugh, it seems to be harder to be surprised these days. As you say, I think it relates to the dearth of intellectualism, in general, but especially in politics and even more especially within Bobby Jindal’s self-proclaimed stupid party. The fact Barton is on such a committee with his very limited understanding should be a surprise. Yet, it is not. Mr. Barton are you knowledgeable of eco-energy issues? “No, but I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express,” he might say.
The weather as climate issue is a broader one. The first part we should try to say is you are confusing weather for longer term climate. If they persist, we could say, well you do realize it is summer in the Southern Hemisphere and in spite of the polar vortex, January was one of the hottest January’s in a long while?
Then, the chair of Barton’s committee debated Bill Nye over climate change the other day. She said he was only an actor and engineer, so his opinion was not credible. Thanks for highlighting this issue. BTG
Apparently stupidity is spreading, especially in D.C. One only wishes there was some way to bottle all the hot air in Congress: we could solve the energy problem in a hurry! Thanks for the comment, BTG.
Hugh, would love to see your thoughts on my post today reflecting on Jindal’s comments of a year ago. I had been thinking of framing this issue and after reading your and Barney’s recent ones, felt that Jindal one year later was the better way to go. Thanks, BTG