The son of my blog buddy BTG recently graduated from High Point University in North Carolina. The commencement address was delivered by Colin Powell. (This beats the recent commencement speaker at my alma mater who was Michael Wilbon — one of the talking heads on ESPN.) In any event, Powell had some wise words to share with the graduates and he stressed, among other things, the need for the young people sitting before him to get involved and learn the art of compromise. He reminded the students that the founding of this country was made possible only because of the willingness of those remarkable men to compromise. Somehow, that spirit of compromise has died.
Reflection leads us to a number of possibilities as to why this has happened. To begin with the obvious, the country is considerably larger and the political process much more complex than it was in the eighteenth century. When the founders were trying to figure how to escape from the stifling embrace of England, they had a common purpose. To be sure, there were divided loyalties, since many feared the wrath of the most powerful nation on earth — and wanted its continued protection. Bear in mind that the Spanish and French had been on the continent for years before the Pilgrims landed and the New England colonies got organized. Together with the native people, they were viewed as a constant threat. So a number of the founders simply were willing to put up with a few minor inconveniences, such as taxation without representation, in order to have the assurance that the English army and navy was there to protect them. But thanks to the foolishness of the British in Boston, the wisdom of Washington and Jefferson, and the persuasive powers of people like John Adams, the representatives gathered in Philadelphia were willing to compromise and declare independence from England. Without a willingness to compromise, there could have been no Declaration of Independence.
But the notion of compromise today is equated in the minds of a great many people with “capitulation,” the willingness to sell out, a form of cowardice. Loyalty in the political arena is not to an idea, as it was in 1776, it is to the political party (which did not exist in 1776) and to the corporate interests that support the party and determines reelection or failure in political office. Things have changed considerably, and it it’s not only about the increased size of the country, it’s more about what really matters. To the colonial founders, what mattered was their independence and ability to determine their own future without the outside influence of a power across the sea that really took little interest in their future, other than to be sure of a steady supply of tobacco and cotton and continued income from taxes paid. Today, there is no idea, except the idea of continuing in a cushy office (hey, it beats real work!) with the assurance of great wealth after retirement, either as a lobbyist for one of the corporations, or simply from the wise investment of funds made available during the term in office.
Clearly, Colin Powell was addressing the current inability of the sitting congress to compromise and see the larger canvas — the national interest that was once referred to as “The Common Good.” He knows whereof he speaks. If the reasons for this inability are not clear, then it is because the person who fails to see them simply doesn’t want to look. It is self-interest, pure and simple, the very thing the Greeks knew would eventually destroy any political body no matter how strong and well conceived it might happen to be. I suspect Colin Powell knows that. He has something that so many others in the public eye seem to lack: clear vision and the ability to make sacrifices that are necessary in order to guarantee that the nation he loves and has dedicated his life to does not take the wrong turn. His were words of wisdom, and one can only hope that they are heard not only by those graduates sitting in North Carolina, but by all who have ears, and especially those in power who determine the future of this country.
Thanks Hugh. In addition to the post on the subject, as you know I sent out many emails to various people. Since Powell’s message was so powerful and his reputation in good stead (coupled with the personal aspect of my son graduating), I have received over thirty emails concurring with this sentiment. On the converse, I did receive one email from an ultra-conservative NC legislator who wanted to unsubscribe to my emails. I said I respected that he receives a lot of emails, but since he was an elected official, as long as I was sending him concerns on state issues and doing so in an informed and civil manner, he was obligated to get my emails. He did not have to read them, but he should at least receive them. I found it ironic that he chose this email (after all the others) to respond in this way. Best wishes, BTG
Ironic, but not surprising. We are electing idiots to the legislature around the country and to national offices as as well. They don’t want to hear dissenting opinions — even if they are well-reasoned like yours (especially if they are well-reasoned!)
I would redouble my email efforts, if I were you. HAHA!!
Amaya, I am sure I am viewed by some already as a pain in the hind end, so doubling the efforts would make them delete the emails twice as fast. BTG
My main concern is the unwillingness by any group to even listen to individuals with opposing viewpoints. Compromise can’t occur if there exists no dialogue. How disappointing that students at Rutgers protested against Condoleezza Rice speaking at commencement – perhaps a graduating class not prepared to engage in compromise or dialogue.
One would expect more of college students — ideally. Unfortunately, this is becoming more and more common. Thanks for reading, Katy.