The Trumpet blows loud and almost always off-key. But what he tells us is that his business acumen will once again make America great. In saying this I am put in mind of a recent article in Yahoo Finance titled “Why Donald Trump is a Lousy Executive” that points out the probable lack of success of a presidential Donald The Trumpet — based on his obvious personality disorders:
Awful executives also tend to think that they have all the answers — to all the questions. CEO Wolfgang Schmitt drove Rubbermaid into a ditch during the 1990s. A former colleague remembered that under Schmitt, “the joke went, ‘Wolf knows everything about everything.’” Not surprisingly, know-it-all executives suffer because they fail to consider other points of view that might have merit. In fact, no one is always right, yet lousy executives act as if they are. In this regard, Trump’s impression of his own judgment and intelligence is telling. As he tweeted in May 2013: “Sorry losers and haters, but my I.Q. is one of the highest – and you all know it! Please don’t feel so stupid or insecure, it’s not your fault.” In September 2015, he made a similar statement on “The Tonight Show,” telling host Jimmy Fallon, “I think apologizing’s a great thing, but you have to be wrong. I will absolutely apologize, sometime in the hopefully distant future, if I’m ever wrong.” [Italics added]
In any event, his claim to restore America to its former greatness rests on the assumption that America is not great any more and that given his presidency he will have the power to effect radical change. He will do this apparently by turning over rocks that reveal bigotry, misogyny, racism, hatred, and intolerance; this will restore those years of greatness. But, we might ask, when were those years?
Perhaps he means the nation just after the adoption of the Constitution. But we had no army or navy and were terribly vulnerable to attacks by France, Spain, or Britain — which we discovered when we went up against the British in the war of 1812 , a time when president Thomas Jefferson reluctantly realized that we did need a navy and an army if we were to become a world power. But there wasn’t much of a nation at that time and there certainly wasn’t wide-spread prosperity (which, I suspect, is what the Trumpet means by “great”).
Could he be talking about the 1920’s when the Hoover campaign promised a “chicken in every pot and a car in every backyard”? But this was a time when, despite the general prosperity of the country at large, there was also wide-spread suffering and unemployment among farmers, laborers, and minorities. Indeed, there were those who saw a depression alongside the highest standard of living the world had ever known.
Or, will the Trumpet make America great again by returning it to the days of Eisenhower, a post-war economy that gave us widespread materialism and the promise of never having to put off until tomorrow what we can own today — thanks to the charge card? This was an era of moderate wealth within the middle class. Recently the gap has grown between the wealthy and the very poor and the middle class has all but disappeared, so it is hard to see how prosperity in the country at large can be restored when it is the middle class that must have the buying power necessary to turn the tide. I don’t recall the Trumpet pledging to restore the middle classes to their former strength by such things as, say, raising the minimum wage. But, then, I don’t listen to him any more; he might have made such a pledge. He would if he thought it would advance his personal agenda.
Perhaps the Trumpet means to return to the high level of prosperity during the Bill Clinton years when unemployment dropped by 3.9%, the labor force grew by 2.8 million folks who had previously been unemployed under the Reagan Administration during which the 1% began to dodge the tax man and the rest of us waited for the money to “trickle down.” Or, when, under Clinton, the G.D.P. growth was at 3.8%, inflation was stable, and median wages grew from $661.00 a week to $700.00 a week. But, the Trumpet can’t be referring to those years, because they were years under a Democratic president and the Republican camp refuses to admit that Clinton restored an economy that had been crippled by his predecessor.
So, in the end, it is not clear what era the Trumpet is referring to. Which was the age we shall return to in achieving our greatness once again? He is certainly correct in saying that the tarnish has worn off the eagle, given the present state of the nation in the eyes of the rest of the world. But it is not clear how this man proposes to restore a greatness that is hard to define, much less quantify — especially since his preeminence in the political race has already driven much of the world community even farther away from America. He is long on generalities and half-truths — not to mention blatant falsehoods. So it is hard to see what he has in mind and how he thinks he can pull it off, given that he will not be a dictator, but simply the executor of the will of a corrupt and, I dare say uncooperative, Congress.
But none of the Trumpet faithful seems to be interested in these considerations. It’s not clear what they ARE interested in. Or what they hear when he speaks. Or what is going on between their ears, if anything.
Good post, Hugh. Relatively speaking, America is doing pretty well. The dilemma is some aren’t reaping the good results. Yet, the demise of the middle class has been occurring for 35 years.
As for leadership, there has been a trend toward more introverted leaders, given the complexities of multiple business corporations. Think Gates, Cook, Buffett, etc. Trump is a developer who benefits from aggrandizing opportunities. The hyperbole is needed to glean investors and sell local governments on the idea. Yet, the modus operandi for a developer tends to be get in, make your money, get out and leave the problems for others . That is Trump’s history, one of exploiting others for money.
So, this bravado does not translate well into leadership. I believe he would be a horrible leader based on his history, divisiveness and thin skin. He would make America less safe and greatly harm our image. That is my two cents. Keith
That’s pretty much the conclusion reached in the article I noted above. He would make an awful president for so many reasons!
Putin would use Trump’s thin skin to his advantage. Trump’s ego and unfiltered mouth would tick off allies. And, so on..
Well-written blog, Hugh, and good replies, Keith. I hate to compare Trump bluntly to Hitler because there that’s such an extreme. But these qualities about Trump echo things I read about a younger, developing Hitler in a Nazi-Germany history course I took in college: Hitler only read books and articles that reinforced and emboldened ideas he already held, was immediately dismissive of other opinions, and was always convinced he was the smartest man in the room. And, of course, he was notoriously thin-skinned. Add the general demagoguery and bluster, the scapegoating of ethnic groups, the support of white-supremacist groups for Trump …
I haven’t found an in-depth interview with Trump employees or execs that would give us insight into how well (or poorly) he leads inside his company. The country could use some of those perspectives.
Indeed they would — if the were listening. But I suspect that so many of those who will go to the polls in November are driven by what they want to hear!