Hannah Arendt tells us that the lesser of two evils is still evil. She’s right. And the rumor is going around (especially among those who incline toward a third party candidate in the presidential race) that Hillary is evil even though the lesser of evils. This is a libel and should be rejected as such.
In fact, this woman is extremely well prepared to take the highest office in this land. Not only was she a Senator and the Secretary of State, but she was also married to a two-term president and knows how the ugly game of politics is played. And there’s the rub! She is a politician in a day when politicians are all painted with the same tar brush. But in doing this we ignore folks like Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders who have shown that it is possible to swim in the putrid waters of Washington politics and not get dirty. Moreover, the former editor of the Wall Street Journal (that “most conservative” of newspapers) stated in print that while doing research on Hillary Clinton for an article she was writing she discovered that Hillary is one of the most honest people in Washington. Now, that may be condemning with faint praise, but it is praise indeed — coming from that source.
Additionally, as noted in a recent blog by my favorite blogger who was comparing Hillary’s agenda with that of Donald Trump, she was
Unable to find anything more than the above regarding Trump’s platform on mental health, I did the unthinkable and went to his campaign website in search of. Remember Hillary’s 38-point platform? Trump has a 7-point platform. No, mental health is not one of the seven. So, I cannot make a comparison between his platform and Hillary’s. Suffice it to say that Ms. Clinton has a comprehensive platform and a plan to improve mental health care, while her opponent has nothing beyond mockery and scorn.
In a word, Hillary stands for important principles — dealing with the economy, education, the environment, health, national security, and social equality, including gay rights — while her opponent can only stand by and call her nasty names. He has no platform on which to stand and his perspective is warped by his hatred and fear of those who differ from himself. But the important point is that, despite her lack of popularity, Hillary Clinton is well prepared for the office of president whereas her opponent(s) — all of them — are not.
This should be kept in mind in November though one will almost certainly not see it written in large letters in the newspapers across this great land of ours, because Hillary is dull compared with Donald Trump who is a circus clown primed to entertain and confuse us all into taking him seriously (and sell newspapers and air time!). The media have always preferred clowns, because that’s what folks seem to want. But for those of us who can see beyond the printed page or the sound-bite on television, it is clear who is and who is not best prepared to be our next president. Dull perhaps, but also very bright and fully aware of what lies ahead for the next president. By no means the lesser of evils.
Love this post, Hugh! You know … the two independent candidates failed to qualify to participate in the debates … no surprise there, as the deck was stacked against them … but I rather find myself wishing they could participate. There would then be 3 candidates who wish to talk about issues, qualifications, experience, etc., and Trump would look even more like a buffoon than he already does. I fear that Hillary will lower herself to his standards of behaviour if it is only the two of them. Thanks for the mention, by the way … 🙂
You are most welcome, though as a single blogger you deserve to be identified as such. I made the change!
Heck, I wasn’t worried about it … I was just honoured to be counted among your favourite bloggers! Made me 🙂
I think what we have going here is mutual admiration — and like minds!! 🙂
I don’t think we’ve had s good choice in the Republican Party for a long time. However, I’ll be voting Trump (the lesser of two evils). I’ve seen what Hilary can do. I don’t have high hopes for either one of them.
My hope was to make the case against the notion that Hillary was “evil” in any sense of that word. I obviously failed in your case. But I honestly don’t see how Trump could be your choice — or anyone else’s for that matter. Evil is not the issue here. The issue is who is better prepared to lead this country at a time of global crisis. Trump has failure written all over his face. Thanks for the visit and the comment!