Huck’s Values

In an otherwise insightful introduction to a new edition of five of Mark Twain’s finest novels, Elizabeth Boyle Machlan, Ph.D., makes a fundamental error. She begins with Huck’s fairly long reflection about whether he did the right thing to lie in order to save the runaway slave Jim:

“I thought a minute, and says to myself, hold on; s’pose you’d a done right and give Jim up, would you feel better than you do now? No, says I. I’d feel bad — I’d feel just the way I do now. Well, then, says I, what’s the use you learning to do the right thing when it’s troublesome to do right and ain’t no trouble to do wrong, and wages is just the same? I was stuck. I couldn’t answer that.

Commenting on this passage, Machlan, Ph.D., tells us that:

“Through Huck, Twain reveals the relativity of right and wrong in a fundamentally unjust society.”

In fact, this passage from Huckleberry Finn does not show the “relativity of right and wrong.” On the contrary it shows the universal nature of certain values, such values as friendship and loyalty and perhaps even true justice. While the boy has been brought up to believe that black men and women are inferior to whites and as slaves they are property that should be returned to their owners, he senses that this is simply quite wrong. That is to say, he is not simply a product of what sociologists like to call “enculturation” since he rejects those values he has been brought up to espouse in favor of a deeper sense that it would be quite simply wrong to turn Jim over to the authorities. Lying is wrong, to be sure, (and he feels bad about that), but telling the truth in this case would be much worse, especially if it means giving up your friend.

It is possible that Twain is embracing the ideas of natural human sympathy that were “in the air” at the time, originating in Scotland and finding their way into the thinking of such diverse thinkers as David Hume and Adam Smith. This was the notion that there is a strong bond of human sympathy that holds us together. We naturally care about other human beings, even if we don’t know them and even if they are on the other side of the planet. Smith thought this sympathy would keep the capitalist from becoming overly wealthy at the cost of exploiting those who worked for him (!). In any event, we don’t know whether Twain embraced those ideas. But he did sense, as did Huckleberry that there is something more valuable than the value of property ownership that demands the return of slaves fleeing for their lives.

Rather than demonstrate the “relativity” of values, then, Twain is demonstrating the transcendental nature of certain values, what philosophers are inclined to call the “objectivity” of values. Huck Finn is not simply a young boy raised in Missouri to believe that blacks are inferior to whites. He is a sensitive young boy who prizes the friendship that has grown between himself and Jim the slave. He cannot give him up. To do so would bother his conscience at least as much as lying to save his friend’s life.

We do live in a relative age, an age in which we insist that values are relative to individuals or, at best, to  cultures. But Twain is asking us to consider the possibility that there are values that transcend those cultures and which are deeper and more precious — more valuable, if you will. Society, or culture, does not dictate what we hold to be true and false, good or bad. It helps us learn to think about such things and teaches us much about what is and is not important. But while we might be influenced (some more than others) by society, it does not follow that our values are determined by society. Huck Finn, like Socrates, Jesus, and even thinkers such as Edith Wharton, are evidence of individuals who have seen beyond the values of their culture and have embraced deeper values, “objective” values, values that transcend any given culture and are much more difficult to cast aside in a crisis.

Thus, Dr. Machlan is mistaken. She may know a great deal about Mark Twain. But she doesn’t understand the true nature of Huck Finn’s dilemma or, indeed, the nature of objective values that are not to be identified with the values that a particular culture espouses and teaches its young — if, indeed, it bothers to teach the young about values at all. Certain values simply are not relative — not to individuals and not to cultures. Huck sensed that and that is why we think of him as an extraordinary young man and admire his honesty, loyalty, friendship, and good sense.

Advertisements

14 thoughts on “Huck’s Values

  1. Hugh, good post. I like to keep it simple. To me, Huck slowly learns that Jim is just like anyone and deserves the same rights. He realizes the unjust nature of treating Blacks so poorly and that good and evil reside in all races. If we only had more conversations like those. Keith

    • Huck is one of those rare people who has a deep sense of right and wrong — he’s not a philosopher: he doesn’t think about these things. He has the right instincts. There are people like this (you are one) and their light shines a bit brighter than the rest. They just turn toward the right course of action and head in that direction.

      • Hugh, I read a troubling item in the paper today that a public school system in Minnesota was foregoing Mark Twain and Harper Lee in the required reading. So, Huck and Atticus will not be familiar to the kids. That is sad. Keith

      • Yeah. It’s the “new wave” in education: protect the kids from “trigger words” — part of the P.C. movement. Why not let them read the words as written and then talk about it in class??? I sometimes despair as those who should be leading the way seem to be blind as bats.

  2. Wonderful commentary on Huck Finn, who is so easy to relate to, and philosophical “objective values.” I’ll post a brief excerpt & link of this piece later today. Very insightful and uplifting.

  3. Pingback: Huck Finn Had Deep Values – JoAnnChateau.com

  4. Excellent thoughts, Hugh! Sometimes, as you have shown, the simplest explanation is the best one. Huck followed his heart. This lesson could be applied to many of today’s circumstances.

    • Following your heart works only if you have a heart as big as Huck’s. For the rest of us we must muddle through, trying to figure out what is right and what is wrong. I do wonder if all humans have an inherent sympathy for their fellows. These days it is hard to accept that, though I would like to!

      • You are, of course, right. But, y’know … despite everything we see around us today, despite all the ugliness that I write about, I have always been an optimist (annoyingly so, some would say) and I find that I remain so. I think most people are basically good, and it is either circumstances or other people who make them as they are. I guess that is, in part, why I keep fighting the good fight, for I believe people can be reminded of the value of humanitarianism. Not that I’m blind to evil in the world, but I just don’t think most people are inherently evil. Sigh. A cockeyed optimist, aye?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s