Totalitarian Threats?

Hannah Arendt wrote The Origins Of Totalitarianism nearly 70 years ago and it focused primarily on Germany and Russia, the countries that at that time were most obviously totalitarian in their treatment of their citizens. One might think that such a book with that particular focus would be  dated and not at all relevant to today’s world. After all, Germany and Russia are no longer the countries they were when Arendt wrote. But the totalitarian tendencies about which she was most interested survive to this day — and not only in those countries, but elsewhere as well.

I venture to predict that as the pressures on all of the countries in the world become greater with the globe warming and food and water increasingly scarce the totalitarian threat will become an increasing concern: power will devolve to fewer and fewer hands to control unrest. And, as Lord Acton reminded us long ago “power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” But I also worry about today and about the trend in this country, led as it is by a man who completely misunderstands the workings of a free society, a man who has shown himself in sympathy with some of the most autocratic leaders on the globe and who has also shown those tendencies himself.

In any event I shall let Arendt speak for herself. I will only add that when she speaks of the “elite” she speaks about the “intelligentsia,” those who have had the most schooling (but may not be well educated) and have assumed leadership roles — those, for example, who have assumed positions of strength in our universities and colleges. And bear in mind that in the not-so-distant past the intelligentsia, especially the young radicals, tended to support the Jacobites, the Nazis and the Communists.  As she says:

“. . .  there is no doubt that the elite [in Germany and Russia] . . . did not object at all to paying a price, the destruction of civilization, for the fun of seeing how those who had been excluded unjustly in the past might force their way into it. They were not particularly outraged at the monstrous forgeries in historiography of which totalitarian regimes are guilty and which announce themselves clearly enough in totalitarian propaganda. They had convinced themselves that traditional historiography was a forgery in any case, since it had excluded the underprivileged and oppressed from the memory of mankind [think: “New History”]. Those who were rejected by their own time were usually forgotten by history, and insult added to injury had troubled all sensitive consciences ever since faith in a hereafter where the last shall be first had disappeared. Injustices in the past as well as the present became intolerable when there was no longer any hope that the scales of justice eventually would be set right. Marx’s great attempt to rewrite world history in terms of class struggles fascinated even those who did not believe in the correctness of his thesis, because of his original intention to find a device by which to force the destinies of those excluded from official history into the memory of posterity. . . .

“To this aversion of the intellectual elite for official historiography, to its conviction that history, which was a forgery anyway, might as well be the playground of crackpots [again, think: “New History”], must be added the terrible, demoralizing fascination with the possibility that gigantic lies and monstrous falsehoods can eventually be established as unquestioned facts, that man may be free to change his own past at will, and that the difference between truth and falsehood may cease to be objective, and become a mere matter of power and cleverness, of pressure and infinite repetition. . . .

“Totalitarianism in power invariably replaces all first-rate talents, regardless of their sympathies, with those crackpots and fools whose lack of intelligence and creativity is still the best guarantee of their loyalty.”

In describing what might be said about the present state of many of our universities and colleges, not to say society itself, she is revealing to us the way the “elite” take over the minds of the young students and outside the academy how propaganda works by recasting the truth in the form of, shall we say,  “false news.” And her discussion of those who have “been excluded unjustly” from the seats of power and who now struggle to find a place at the table is timely indeed  — especially since the “excluded” in America have managed to elect one of their own to the position of greatest power in this country if not the world.

There is more, of course. A great deal more — including a remarkable analysis of the totalitarian type, which is to say, the type of person attracted to absolute power and the steps such a type will take in order to acquire and maintain power. Regarding Hitler, for example, she had this to say:

“Society is always prone to accept a person offhand for what he pretends to be, so that a crackpot posing as a genius always has a certain chance to be believed. In modern society with its characteristic lack of discerning judgment, this tendency is strengthened so that someone who not only holds opinions but also presents them in a tone of unshakable conviction will not so easily forfeit his prestige, no matter how many times he has been demonstrably wrong.”

In reading Arendt’s analysis bells continually go off, especially her description of modern society with its “characteristic lack of discerning judgment.”  I put that down to our floundering education system, as you know. She understood power and its abuses perhaps as well as or even better than Machiavelli. More to the point, her analysis is timely and shines a light on contemporary America, revealing aspects of our present situation that we must always try to understand and struggle against if we are to remain free.


10 thoughts on “Totalitarian Threats?

  1. Hannah Arendt’s work. On the Origins of Totalitarianism, is always worth the reading. It both commands and demands the reader’s attention.

    With few words, she can put a number of things into perspective. For example:

    “Only the mob and the elite can be attracted by the momentum of totalitarianism itself. The masses have to be won by propaganda.”

    Thus we see Der Trumpfer, his wealthy benefactors, those who attend his rallies and who support him, and Fox News — all at the same time in two succinct sentences.

    To these I must also add,

    “The owners of superfluous wealth were the only men who could use the superfluous men…”

    Little wonder that sales of Arendt’s work, especially The Origins of Totalitarianism, have sharply increased since the inauguration of Der Trumpfer.

    Respects and regards,

    Jerry Stark

    • She is one of the deepest minds of the twentieth century, in my view. Her writings abound with insights and provocative suggestions! You recount just a couple.

  2. Hugh, a foreboding topic. Here is a checklist:
    – denigrate the media
    – question government
    – belittle intelligence officials
    – portray that you alone are the answer to all problems
    – overinflate problems to promote simplistic solutions that solve little
    – restrict civil rights and grease the skids for thugs to squelch rights
    – tighten up the influx of outsiders

    Each of the above can be checked off by the man in the White House. Congress must step up to the plate. Keith

  3. It is indeed a most timely analysis. “… crackpot posing as a genius …” I wonder who that reminds us of? And could any better define the sycophants in the administration and in Congress than … “… replaces all first-rate talents, regardless of their sympathies, with those crackpots and fools whose lack of intelligence and creativity is still the best guarantee of their loyalty.”

    Very thought provoking post, as always. I read Arendt’s book many moons ago, but perhaps I shall re-visit it soon. Or write my own. 😉

  4. This most-recent trip to the cyber gleaned lots of new posts to load/read off line. This one of yours made me think of one from John Perkins (Confessions of an Economic Hit Man) – an entertaining read about a casual bar conversation with “Juan” in Mexico:

    With a totally-different tone, my precious friend Jo shares her discovery that her children were not getting the education they imagined; the part about math skills – and using a dictionary were quite entertaining.

    In your post, I especially enjoyed the ‘crackpot’ references, which reflect Arendt’s timeless writing when describing personality types of certain leaders.

  5. It’s easy to ‘predict’ a Fire, when all the elements of conflagration are present.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s