Worldly Wise

Is it possible that women are wiser than men? I ask in all seriousness. Two of the wisest people I have ever encountered (through their writings) are George Eliot and Edith Wharton, both women, needless to say. I ask this while noting that I have read all the philosophers, the “lovers of wisdom,” from Thales to the most recent lover of hair-splitting. Most of the philosophers I have read are brilliant and well worth the effort of pondering the depths they ask us to explore with them. I have learned a great deal and have grown along the way. But with thinkers like Eliot and Wharton I feel as though I have entered another world.

Bear in mind that George Eliot was recognized in her day as a brilliant writer and also a very wise woman. People wrote to her with their problems and expected her to be able to suggest possible solutions. Her novels are full of psychological insight and penetrating observations about the human condition. She was indeed a wise woman. The same can be said for Edith Wharton, though she is seldom mentioned in the same breath as Eliot, despite the fact that she was the first woman to win a Pulitzer for her remarkable novel Age of Innocence. Her novels are rich with insight and spot-on observations — not to mention just plain common sense (which so many men seem to lack).

I am re-reading Wharton’s The Fruit of the Tree, an overlooked novel that has within it all the worldly wisdom one could hope to uncover — along with philosophical problems to tax the deepest mind. She has a way with words, no doubt, and her descriptions are second to none — and were said to inspire such writers as Wallace Stegner. In addition to novels she wrote travelogues at a time when the camera was in its infancy and those who wanted to convey the beauty of what they saw had to use words — a talent that has been too long lost and was rare to begin with.

In The Fruit of the Tree Wharton tells us of a man who marries a wealthy woman in order to join with her to revolutionize the industry where he had once worked as an Assistant Manager — and which she had inherited when her first husband died. They were very much in love, so they thought, and both saw the terrible conditions the workers had to endure in order to scrape together a living while their bosses thought only of the ways they could increase profits. In its day this was heresy as America was going through its Horatio Alger phase and many thought only of how they could get rich. Few worried about the exploited souls who made their wealth possible. And while the novel centers around the struggle of the couple to make the employees’ working conditions, not to say living conditions, more humane, their fragile marriage begins to tear apart. This brings Wharton to such issues as euthanasia and infidelity. The novel has it all!

A few of the insightful comments Wharton makes along the way are worth quoting.

“The disappearance of the old familiar contact between master and man seemed to him one of the great wrongs of the new industrial situation. That the breach must be farther widened by the ultimate substitution of the stock-company for the individual employer — a fact obvious to any student of economic tendencies — presented to [the hero’s] mind one of the most painful problems in the scheme of social readjustment.”

“He had forgotten, too, that the swift apprehension of suffering in others is as much the result of training as the immediate perception of beauty. Both perceptions may be inborn, but if they are not they can only be developed through the discipline of experience.”

“But his demands, moderate as they were, assumed in his hearers the consciousness of a moral claim superior to the obligation of making one’s business ‘pay’ . . . .”

“But it seemed to her that they missed the poetry of their situation, transacting their pleasures with the dreary method and shortness of the view of a race tethered to the ledger.”

“She could not conceive of shutting herself into a little citadel of personal well-being while the great tides of existence rolled unheeded outside. . . .as human nature is constituted it has to find it’s real self — the self to be interested in — outside of what we conventionally call ‘self.'”

As I ponder those comments and recall why it is we read well-written novels it does occur to me that there are a few men who have also written profound words and have shown brilliance and penetrating insight, even worldly wisdom. I hasten to mention Fyodor Dostoevsky and Joseph Conrad as two of my favorites. Perhaps it’s not that Wharton and Elliot were women but that they were novelists. Perhaps. But I still wonder if the women don’t have a corner on worldly wisdom and common sense.


5 thoughts on “Worldly Wise

  1. Hugh, your question today is well worth pondering. Given the fact that the emergence of women as equal contributors to all facets of society is still in its infancy, I’m not sure there is a definitive answer to your question. My life experience teaches me that women bring their unique points of view to the tables of decision-makers, and that is invaluable. Based on this observation, I firmly believe that the ONLY way we can save ourselves as a species and save this planet is by embracing our female members and all they have to offer. History teaches us that males deciding alone without any female participation has led us to the brink of extinction. Are females superior to males in terms of worldly wisdom? I honestly don’t know. But I do know that the answer is irrelevant. We MUST, as a society, embrace all members, no matter their gender identity, and base decisions on our collective wisdom. Thanks for this illuminating post, Hugh.

    • Well said. At the very least what do we have to lose? But I do think women as a rule have more common sense and what I have called “worldly wisdom.” Men have shown us, as you point out, that they have their collective heads up their collective behinds — in so many cases.

  2. Hugh, I won’t opine on your question. One thing is for certain, women are unjustifiably underrepresented in the halls of government. I think some of our governing dysfunction could be alleviated with more elected women and a better representation of the country’s demographics.

    Two examples come to mind. Women tend to be the health caretakers of the family, yet the GOP had eleven men come up with how to repeal and replace the ACA. They came up with horrible legislation which deserved to fail.

    The other is ten female Senators ended a government shutdown caused by Senator Ted Cruz in October, 2013. The US was within 24 hours of defaulting on our debts. Keith

  3. You know better than this, Doctor Curtler.

    Half the Mystery of a man’s life is the objective evidence of his emergence from his Mother, which has ever and will always speak of the Origin of Life. It’s the essential Feature of Human Existence to be aware of this Fact, which is once established and never expires for the Born.

    Hence, the Mother…both near and far, will remain the central Pivot of mankind’s Conscious Orientation, placed second themselves to that which came before. Those who lack such Reverence argue themselves alone. And we know that every Saint prays that NONE remain alone, in the end. Such is the Grace of Heaven, and Heaven’s born among men: entirely out of our Control, but enforced nonetheless.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s