I went all the way back to 2011 to find this post which only garnered one comment at the time. I still think it worth reading and even worth pondering as we seem to have entered a world in which Google has replaced history and the population on the whole seems to be increasingly disinclined to think about things that truly matter.
I have been reading Hannah Arendt’s excellent book, Responsibility and Judgment. In that book, like so many of her other books, she draws lessons from the debacle that occurred in Germany before, during, and after the Second World War. Chiefly, she reflects on the nature of evil — which she calls “banal” — and the fact that so many of us seem to be capable of it. Evil comes, she is convinced, from our unwillingness, if not our inability, to think.
Arnold Toynbee once said that thinking is as difficult for humans as walking on two legs is for a monkey and we do as little as possible the more comfortable we are. We all assume that if we open our mouths and utter an opinion the process involves thought. Such is not the case, however. As Socrates showed many times, our opinions most often are mere “wind eggs,” unexamined prejudgments that prevent real thought by suggesting that we know when in fact we do not. To make matters worse, we are urged in our culture these days not to be “judgmental,” when, in fact, it is precisely judgment that is at the heart of thought. For Socrates, as for Arendt, thought requires a constant dialogue within oneself, a conversation with oneself, if you will. It requires doubt and an insistence that we do not know in spite of our pretensions. As Socrates was fond of saying, we only know that we do not know — at least that is the claim he made for himself. We don’t seem inclined to take on his mantle of humility.
Evil is “banal,” precisely because it issues forth from men and women who do not seek evil ends, but who simply don’t want to be bothered to think about what it is they are doing. Those few who opposed Hitler in Germany, for the most part, were not the intellectuals (who are supposed to be the thinkers), but the ordinary men and women who carried on an inner dialogue with themselves and simply decided they could not cooperate with those who would do terrible things. They would rather die than cooperate with evil men.
Hopefully we will never be called upon to make decisions that make us party to evil; but we are called upon daily to question, to doubt, to consider, and to think about the things we do and the things we choose not to do. And when we have reached a conclusion, the doubt and thinking should begin again. When we have reached a point where we no longer feel doubt is necessary, we are in danger of falling into a dogmatic trap. As Kant would have it,
“I do not share the opinion that one should not doubt once one has convinced oneself of something.”
Doubt must be ongoing if it is to rise to the level of real thought. Arendt is convinced that if the German people had been more (not less) “judgmental” during the 30s of the last century Hitler never would have risen to power and the Second World War and its atrocities would never have happened. Today it is precisely the tendency we have not to think that is the greatest danger as we listen to the bloat and rhetoric of the politicians and demagogs who would capture our minds and take them prisoner.
Our best hope for staying out of this prison is, of course, our schools. But it is clear that they have taken a wrong turn and the schools at all levels are now preoccupied with job preparation instead of mental preparation. This trend feeds into the lethargy that makes it just too much trouble to think seriously about what is going on around us. That is the trap it would seem we have indeed fallen into, preoccupied as we are with creature comforts and job promotions.
We need to recall Socrates’ words, “The unexamined life is not worth living.”
Hugh, good repeat post. Without planning it, the movie I just saw and wrote about “Jo Jo Rabbit,” is a parody of this “banal” thinking leading up to and during WWII. These Nazi youths were taught to dehumanize Jews and burn books. If we say it will never happen again, we need to pay attention to the corruption, deceit and disinformation being espoused by the US president and his sycophants. While genocide may be a bridge too far, the dehumanization and fear mongering fit in with his messaging. Keith
Yes, we are further along the wrong path than we were when I first wrote this.
Excellent post, Hugh. I wasn’t on WordPress in 2011, else I surely would have commented. More and more these days, people are distracted by the ‘shiny objects’ and rather than take time to actually think, they listen to the loud voices to which they are subjected nearly every waking moment and take their direction from whichever ones seem most like them. You are, as we have discussed before, quite right about the schools, at least in this country … they no longer teach young people to think for themselves, to question everything. Is this by design? I think maybe so. I must read “Responsibility and Judgment” by Arendt. The big question, though, is … how do we change this?
It won’t change until or unless “educators” admit there is a problem. And at present they are marshaling their rationalizations to defend their poor performance.
Agreed. And I don’t look for much to change in our lifetime. Sigh.